<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>washingtonpost.com: Recent votes by Rick Santorum</title><link>http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/members/s000059/</link><description>Recent votes by Rick Santorum</description><language>en-us</language><item><title>Congress 109, Senate vote: Vote 277: On the Motion</title><link>http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/109/senate/2/votes/277/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Question: On the Motion.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Category: Motion&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Vote description: Motion to Waive CBA Re: Motion to Concur in House Amendment to the Senate Amendment to H.R.6111.; A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that the Tax Court may review claims for equitable innocent spouse relief and to suspend the running on the period of limitations while such claims are pending.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Result: Agreed to, 67-21, with 12 not voting.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rick Santorum voted &lt;b&gt;Yes&lt;/b&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate><guid>http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/109/senate/2/votes/277/</guid></item><item><title>Congress 109, Senate vote: Vote 279: On the Motion</title><link>http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/109/senate/2/votes/279/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Question: On the Motion.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Category: Motion&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Vote description: Motion to Concur in the House Amendment to the Senate Amendment to H.R. 6111; A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that the Tax Court may review claims for equitable innocent spouse relief and to suspend the running on the period of limitations while such claims are pending.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Result: Agreed to, 79-9, with 12 not voting.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rick Santorum voted &lt;b&gt;Yes&lt;/b&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate><guid>http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/109/senate/2/votes/279/</guid></item><item><title>Congress 109, Senate vote: Vote 278: On the Cloture Motion</title><link>http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/109/senate/2/votes/278/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Question: On the Cloture Motion.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Category: Cloture&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Vote description: Motion to Invoke Cloture on the Motion to Concur in the House Amdt. to Senate Amdt. to H.R. 6111; A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that the Tax Court may review claims for equitable innocent spouse relief and to suspend the running on the period of limitations while such claims are pending.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Result: Agreed to, 78-10, with 12 not voting.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rick Santorum voted &lt;b&gt;Yes&lt;/b&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate><guid>http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/109/senate/2/votes/278/</guid></item><item><title>Congress 109, Senate vote: Vote 276: On the Nomination</title><link>http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/109/senate/2/votes/276/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Question: On the Nomination.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Category: Nomination&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Vote description: Confirmation Kent A. Jordan of Delaware to be U.S. Circuit Judge&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Result: Confirmed, 91-0, with 9 not voting.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rick Santorum voted &lt;b&gt;Yes&lt;/b&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate><guid>http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/109/senate/2/votes/276/</guid></item><item><title>Congress 109, Senate vote: Vote 275: On the Cloture Motion</title><link>http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/109/senate/2/votes/275/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Question: On the Cloture Motion.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Category: Cloture&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Vote description: Motion to Invoke Cloture on the Nomination of Kent A. Jordan of Delaware to be U.S. Circuit Judge&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Result: Agreed to, 93-0, with 7 not voting.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rick Santorum voted &lt;b&gt;Yes&lt;/b&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate><guid>http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/109/senate/2/votes/275/</guid></item><item><title>Congress 109, Senate vote: Vote 274: On the Nomination</title><link>http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/109/senate/2/votes/274/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Question: On the Nomination.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Category: Nomination&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Vote description: Confirmation Andrew von Eschenbach, of Texas, to be Commissioner of Food and Drugs&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Result: Confirmed, 80-11, with 9 not voting.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rick Santorum voted &lt;b&gt;No&lt;/b&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate><guid>http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/109/senate/2/votes/274/</guid></item><item><title>Congress 109, Senate vote: Vote 273: On the Cloture Motion</title><link>http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/109/senate/2/votes/273/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Question: On the Cloture Motion.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Category: Cloture&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Vote description: Motion to Invoke Cloture on the Nomination of Andrew von Eschenbach, of Texas, to be Commissioner of Food and Drugs&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Result: Agreed to, 89-6, with 5 not voting.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rick Santorum voted &lt;b&gt;No&lt;/b&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate><guid>http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/109/senate/2/votes/273/</guid></item><item><title>Congress 109, Senate vote: Vote 272: On the Nomination</title><link>http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/109/senate/2/votes/272/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Question: On the Nomination.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Category: Nomination&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Vote description: Confirmation: Robert M. Gates, of Texas, to be Secretary of Defense&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Result: Confirmed, 95-2, with 3 not voting.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rick Santorum voted &lt;b&gt;No&lt;/b&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate><guid>http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/109/senate/2/votes/272/</guid></item><item><title>Congress 109, Senate vote: Vote 271: On the Motion</title><link>http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/109/senate/2/votes/271/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Question: On the Motion.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Category: Motion&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Vote description: Motion to Waive CBA "Emergency Designation" Re: Conrad Amdt. No. 5205; To provide emergency agricultural disaster assistance.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Result: Rejected, 57-37, with 6 not voting.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rick Santorum voted &lt;b&gt;No&lt;/b&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate><guid>http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/109/senate/2/votes/271/</guid></item><item><title>Congress 109, Senate vote: Vote 270: H R 5682</title><link>http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/109/senate/2/votes/270/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Question: On Passage of the Bill.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Bill: &lt;a href="http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/109/bills/h_r_5682/"&gt;H R 5682&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Vote description: H.R. 5682 As Amended; Henry J. Hyde United States and India Nuclear Cooperation Promotion Act of 2006&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Result: Passed, 85-12, with 3 not voting.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rick Santorum voted &lt;b&gt;Yes&lt;/b&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 05:00:00 -0000</pubDate><guid>http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/109/senate/2/votes/270/</guid></item></channel></rss>